Naser Mansour
7f35297025
Naser confirmed all remaining QA Review / Draft rows (97 subtasks, 16
parent rollups) are done in substance: the site has been in production
for roughly a year. Overrides the conservative QA-Review/Draft mapping
from the prior takeover commit (0f9d12c) at his explicit instruction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
id, title, status, date, parent
| id | title | status | date | parent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-6 | 10-6 Documentation Update | Done | 2026-09-27 | 10 |
Description
As a developer I want to update all documentation to reflect the new brand colors So that future development references accurate color information. Core Documentation: - CLAUDE.md - docs/prd.md - docs/architecture.md - docs/brand.md (verify accuracy). Full implementation history: docs/stories/story-10.6-documentation-update.md
Acceptance Criteria
- AC1: CLAUDE.md Updated: Given
CLAUDE.mdcontains color guidance; When I update the file; Then the following sections are updated: - AC2: PRD Updated: Given
docs/prd.mdcontains detailed color specifications; When I update the document; Then the following sections are updated: - AC3: Architecture Document Updated: Given
docs/architecture.mdmay contain color references; When I review and update the document; Then any color references are updated to new palette - AC4: Epic 9 Stories Referenced as Superseded: Given Epic 9 stories implemented the original Navy+Gold palette; When I review Epic 9 story files; Then a note is added indicating colors were updated in Epic 10:
- AC5: Epic 10 Document Updated: Given
docs/epics/epic-10-brand-color-refresh.mdexists; When all stories are complete; Then the epic document is updated with completion status - AC6: brand.md Verified Accurate: Given
docs/brand.mddefines the new brand; When I review the document; Then it accurately describes: - AC7: No Stale Color References: Given documentation should be accurate; When I search all markdown files for old hex values; Then no references to old colors remain: